I Was Sitting On The Fence.....
About 3 decades ago (in my early-30's), I grew up a bit, and finally became generally interested in current events.  I made preparations to start voting, and after careful consideration of the subject, I registered as a Non-Partisan Independent. 
I remain an Independent today.  
The motivation for such a choice, runs deep across each stratum of my being.  I see both the pro and con of life in general, and I cannot --- in all good conscience --- jump onto one or the other bandwagon of extremity.  
(This open-minded quality creates a healthy balance for me, as a counterpoint to my intense, and  basically extreme, Scorpio nature!)  
In reference to the world-wide controversy of going to war with Iraq ..... when it comes to conflict, I am mostly a pacifist in my philosophy, but not an extremist or fanatic about it.  As a result of all factors in the mix --- I was undecided as to where I stood on the issue.  
Then on March 17, 2003, I read the following item sent via email by a friend.  
Indecision escaped on the wings of Clarity, and I have bid that proverbial fence, "Adieu". 
(Now I know some people will be offended by my using the French word for "Goodbye", and want to punish me in some way.  
My response???
The issue is not a problem for me --- and I don't intend it to make it so.  
However I would like to offer a suggestion:  
Maybe all those folks who want to over-react by changing the name of French Fries to "Freedom Fries", would enjoy an even bigger act of protestation.  
They could gleefully toss the Statue of Liberty into the Atlantic Ocean --- after all, she WAS a gift from FRANCE!!! 
  
Continuing (now that I've probably made an armload of enemies!) ..... 
  
I present the words which helped me to make up my mind.  Perhaps you will let them rattle around in your brain for awhile too, and see if they do something for you, one way or the other.
~~~~~~~~
 
Thoughts and words from one of the planet's wise and experienced elders:
(he is ~95 years old)
An Excerpt
 From
 "PEACE FOR OUR TIME"
by
Alistair Cooke
 
Respected
BBC Broadcaster
About the author:
"In 1936, the NBC network invited Alistair Cooke to do a weekly broadcast of reflections on British life called London Letter.  Cooke then emigrated to the United States in 1937, and asked the BBC to let him do the same thing in reverse. Eventually he succeeded, and `Letter from America' is now the longest running radio broadcast in human history.  In the process it has won a faithful worldwide audience of several million and many friends in high places. When Cooke was awarded an honorary knighthood in 1973, the Queen is reputed to have expressed bewildered admiration at his ability to sit down, week after week, and communicate so directly with hisĀ audience."
-WBUR-
Now ..... let's hear from Sir Alistair Cooke!
  
~~~~~~~~
 
Monday, 3 February, 2003, 11:45 GMT  
"...I promised to lay off topic A - Iraq - until the Security Council makes a judgment on the inspectors' report and I shall keep that promise. 
But I must tell you that throughout the past fortnight I've listened to everybody involved in or looking on to a monotonous din of words, like a tide crashing and receding on a beach - making a great noise  and saying the same thing over and over.  And this ordeal triggered a nightmare - a day-mare, if you like. 
Through the ceaseless tide I heard a voice, a very English voice of an old man - Prime Minister Chamberlain saying:  "I believe it is peace for our time" - a sentence that prompted a huge cheer, first from a listening street crowd and then from the House of Commons and next day from every newspaper in the land. 
There was a move to urge that Mr. Chamberlain should receive the Nobel Peace Prize. 
In Parliament there was one unfamiliar old grumbler to growl out:  "I believe we have suffered a total and unmitigated defeat."  He was, in view of the general sentiment, very properly booed down.   
This scene concluded in the autumn of 1938 the British prime minister's effectual signing away of most of Czechoslovakia to Hitler.  The rest of it, within months, Hitler walked in and conquered.  "Oh dear," said Mr. Chamberlain, thunderstruck.  "He has betrayed my trust."  
During the last fortnight a simple but startling thought occurred to me - every single official, diplomat, president, prime minister involved in the Iraq debate was in 1938 a toddler, most of them unborn.  So the dreadful scene I've just drawn will not have been remembered by most listeners. 
Hitler had started betraying our trust not 12 years but only two years before, when he broke the First World War peace treaty by occupying the demilitarised zone of the Rhineland.  Only half his troops carried one reload of ammunition because Hitler knew that French morale was too low to confront any war just then and 10 million  of 11 million  British voters had signed a so-called peace ballot. It stated no conditions, elaborated no terms, it simply counted the numbers of Britons who were "for peace". 
The slogan of this movement was "Against war and fascism" - chanted at the time by every Labour man and Liberal and many moderate Conservatives - a slogan that now sounds as imbecilic as "against hospitals and disease".  In blunter words a majority of Britons would do anything, absolutely anything, to get rid of Hitler except fight him. 
At that time the word pre-emptive had not been invented, though today it's a catchword. After all the Rhineland was what it said it was -  part of Germany.  So to march in and throw Hitler out would have been pre-emptive - wouldn't it? 
Nobody did anything and Hitler looked forward with confidence to gobbling up the rest of Western Europe country by country - "course by course", as growler Churchill put it. 
I bring up Munich and the mid-30s because I was fully grown, on the verge of 30, and knew we were indeed living in the age of anxiety.  And so many of the arguments mounted against each other today, in the last fortnight, are exactly what we heard in the House of Commons debates and read in the French press. 
The French especially urged, after every Hitler invasion, "negotiation, negotiation".  They negotiated so successfully as to have their whole country defeated and occupied.  But as one famous French leftist said:  "We did anyway manage to make them declare Paris an open city - no bombs on us!" 
In Britain the general response to every Hitler advance was  disarmament and collective security.  Collective security meant to leave every crisis to the League of Nations.  It would put down aggressors, even though, like the United Nations, it had no army, navy or air force. 
The League of Nations had its chance to prove itself when Mussolini invaded and conquered Ethiopia (Abyssinia).  The League didn't have any shot to fire. 
But still the cry was chanted in the House of Commons - the League and collective security is the only true guarantee of peace. 
But after the Rhineland the maverick Churchill decided there was no collectivity in collective security and started a highly unpopular campaign for rearmament by Britain, warning against the general belief that Hitler had already built an enormous mechanised army and superior air force. 
But he's not used them, he's not used them - people protested.  Still for two years before the outbreak of the Second War you could read the debates in the House of Commons and now shiver at the famous Labour men - Major Attlee was one of them - who voted against rearmament and still went on pointing to the League of Nations as the saviour.  Now, this memory of mine may be totally irrelevant to the present crisis.  It haunts me. 
I have to say I have written elsewhere with much conviction that most historical analogies are false because, however strikingly similar a new situation may be to an old one, there's usually one element that is different and it turns out to be the crucial one.  It may well be so here. 
All I know is that all the voices of the 30s are echoing through 2003..." 
~~~~~~~~ 
LINKS
Recap 
COMPLETE Transcript  
Index of Show Transcripts 
Cooke's Profile 
Additional Resources 
The BBCi 
NPR 
WBUR 
BU 
~~~~~~~~
Final Note:  
On which side of the issue have I come to rest?  
President Bush is applying the well-known Sports Principle: 
"The Best Defense is a Good Offense"  
I'm supporting him.  
~Shelley 
~~~~~~~~  
finis 
							 
					
Recent Comments